Electoral
Contestations in Zimbabwe: ‘New’ Social Classes and Search for Transformation
Zimbabwe’s
current political contestations have been largely shaped by the conflict lines
between a liberation movement that has turned authoritarian and an opposition
movement which has advanced ‘social democracy’ as an alternative. On one hand the ruling elites marshalled
state power to effect a fast track track land reform while closing down on
democratic space and those outside the ‘party-state’ coalesced around the
Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), the National Constitutional Assembly
(NCA) and finally the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in September 1999. At
the formation of the NCA and MDC, Zimbabwe’s economy was highly formalised and
most of the labour force unionised meaning there was a considerable ‘labour
class power’ .
The economic
structural adjustment of the 1990s and
the Fast Track Land Reform led to the decimation of unionised labour. In its stead this has been replaced by ‘New
Farmers’, a pervasive informal sector,
cross border traders, small scale mining
and petty trading. Professor
Brian Raftopoulos pointed that Zimbabwe is now characterised by a ‘reconfigured
political economy’ (See the article titled ‘Zimbabwean Politics in the Post-2013 Election Period’, in the journal Africa Spectrum number 49 Vol 2, 91- 103). This question has attracted research interest
from scholars but the political effect of that has not been interpreted into
the political practices of the broadly defined ‘pro-democracy movement’. The nature of
this reconfiguration has meant the erosion of the power of the social forces
that had been instrumental to social and political influence of the NCA,
the ZCTU and formed the power
base of the ‘democratic movement’. Our
interest is to explore the character of this ‘reconfigured political economy’
and ask questions about what this means for
contemporary and future electoral politics, political change, economic
transformation and active citizenship.
Gravitas
therefore calls for opinion editorial pieces of between 1300-1500 words that
seek to unpack, expand and deepen the debate on the reconfigured political
economy and draw lessons or insights on what this may mean for the
pro-democracy movement in the 2018 elections.
Articles may
focus on, but not limited to the following:
·
Social classes, power and elections
·
Political parties’ manifestos, ideologies and key national
questions
·
Civil society, elections and social change
·
Gender contestations, women empowerment and elections
·
Commodification of elections and electoral accountability
Articles, subject
to editing and reviewing, are to be emailed to the following addresses by
1300hrs, Thursday 27th of April 2017: gravitas@ipazim.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment